Connect with us

Trending

We Tried A Splurgy Celeb-Loved Treatment That Promises Glowy Skin — And Had Two Different Take-Aways

Published

on

Ryan’s feedback:

What I Loved:

• I truly think that SmoothGlo gave me an overall smoothed look to my face. Multiple friends told me that my skin looked great when they saw me. And I’m from Jersey, so we don’t really do fake compliments. 

• For me, it was relatively low pain.

• The treatments have also been super helpful in preventing breakouts on my forehead, where I used to get them. 

• SmoothGlo felt very modern. The machine isn’t some big, scary device where you have no clue what’s happening. The filter settings are amazing — it’s literally like applying your needs in the form of an iPhone filter.

• There is very little downtime. 

• You can get it while you’re getting injectables and Botox. During some of my sessions, I was fresh off getting filler and botox.

What I Didn’t Like:

• Rosacea doesn’t have a cure, so SmoothGlo wasn’t totally able to eradicate the redness in my cheeks, like I had hoped. It decreased it, but based on sun exposure, I still have it. However, Dr. Kung introduced me to this prescription cream called Rhofade, which constricts the blood vessels in the face, and thus improved my rosacea  

• The cost isn’t ideal in today’s economy, unless you have disposable income.

Final Thoughts:

•  If you’ve got the money and you’re looking to get a step-up from a facial or expensive new moisturize to prepare for a wedding or heavily photographed event, I’d recommend this treatment. I hope this post was helpful and informative, and feel free to DM me with questions about my SmoothGlo experience.

Trending

Parents Who Had Kids Later In Life Reveal The Joys And Challenges Of Raising Them At An “Older” Age

Published

on

10.

“I had my first baby at 33 through IVF, and my husband was 41. This was after five years of trying on our own. Then we unexpectedly got pregnant on our own two more times, and I had babies at ages 35 and 37. We never intended to have a baby at ages 37 and 45, but here we are, and we couldn’t imagine our lives without her. But I think the mix of three pregnancies in four years and my age destroyed my SI joint and hips. I think if I were younger, it wouldn’t have been so bad.”

“With baby number three, I was in so much pain that I seriously wasn’t sure if I could make it. I felt like my legs were going to give out on me because of the pain and weakness brought on by SI joint dysfunction and SPD. I am better now, but still not at 100% two years postpartum. Also, man, we are tired. Looking back to all those late nights partying in my early 20s and getting up and going to work the next day like it was no big deal makes me realize how much of an advantage it is to have kids young. But we are more established in our careers, more mature, and have different priorities now. In a lot of ways, it makes it easier to have kids older. I’ve heard people talk about not wanting to have kids at an older age because they won’t be around as long, but my dad was 34 when I was born and died at age 46 from pancreatic cancer when I was only 12 years old, and my sister was 6, so who knows? Age isn’t everything. It’s about finding the right time for you. If I had gotten pregnant when we first started trying, I would have had a baby at 27, but I am glad it worked out the way it did.”

—Anonymous 

Continue Reading

Trending

31 Then Vs. Now Photos Of Celebrities In 2003, 2013, And 2023

Published

on

Celeb Then And Now Photos In 2003, 2013, And 2023

And here’s Reese now in 2023:

And here’s Emma now in 2023:

And here’s Jennifer now in 2023:

4.

This is Beyoncé in 2003:

And here’s Beyoncé now in 2023:

And here’s Paul now in 2023:

Here’s Gabrielle in 2013:

And here’s Gabrielle now in 2023:

7.

This is Michelle Yeoh in 2003:

And here’s Michelle now in 2023:

8.

This is Lindsay Lohan in 2003:

And here’s Lindsay now in 2023:

9.

This is Pete Wentz in 2003:

And here’s Pete now in 2023:

10.

This is Justin Timberlake in 2003:

And here’s Justin now in 2023:

11.

This is Tia and Tamera Mowry in 2003:

Here’s Tia and Tamera in 2013:

And here’s Tia and Tamera now in 2023:

12.

This is Dakota Fanning in 2003:

And here’s Dakota now in 2023:

13.

This is Kirsten Dunst in 2003:

And here’s Kirsten now in 2023:

14.

This is Christina Ricci in 2003:

Here’s Christina in 2013:

And here’s Christina now in 2023:

15.

This is Usher in 2003:

And here’s Usher now in 2023:

16.

This is Jennifer Aniston in 2003:

And here’s Jennifer now in 2023:

17.

This is Jennifer Garner in 2003:

And here’s Jennifer now in 2023:

18.

This is Kate Hudson in 2003:

And here’s Kate now in 2023:

19.

This is Chad Michael Murray in 2003:

And here’s Chad now in 2023:

20.

This is Matthew McConaughey in 2003:

And here’s Matthew now in 2023:

21.

This is Kristen Bell in 2003:

And here’s Kristen now in 2023:

22.

This is Anne Hathaway in 2003:

And here’s Anne now in 2023:

23.

This is Ryan Reynolds in 2003:

And here’s Ryan now in 2023:

24.

This is Queen Latifah in 2003:

And here’s Queen now in 2023:

25.

This is Prince Harry in 2003:

Here’s Prince Harry in 2013:

And here’s Prince Harry now in 2023:

26.

This is Halle Berry in 2003:

And here’s Halle now in 2023:

27.

This is Jessica Alba in 2003:

And here’s Jessica now in 2023:

28.

This is Avril Lavigne in 2003:

And here’s Avril now in 2023:

29.

This is Danny DeVito in 2003:

And here’s Danny now in 2023:

30.

This is Victoria Beckham in 2003:

And here’s Victoria now in 2023:

31.

Finally, this is Keanu Reeves in 2003:

And here’s Keanu now in 2023:

Continue Reading

Trending

11 Things From Tasty That’ll Have A Big Impact On Your Cooking

Published

on

Promising review: “I like that this is big, strong, and I can use the side to cut my fish in half. Slides easily under pizza, pancakes, or whatever you are cooking. I also love the color. Matches my spoon rest and so many more of my items I have purchased from Walmart !” —Linda

Price: $4.44 (originally $4.97)

Continue Reading

Trending